Let’s prove that is irrational. An irrational number is one that cannot be written in the form
, where
and
are both integers; in other words there is no repeating pattern in it’s decimal.
First, let’s prove that if is a multiple of
then so is
. Assume that
is not a multiple of
. Then
can be written as:
where
. Then
. We can factor out a
, so
. This implies
is not a multiple of
since it’s an integer times
plus a number that isn’t a multiple of
(that’s the
part). We have proved the contrapositive which implies our original proposition (
is the same as
).
Now let’s move on to the main proof. Assume, by way of contradiction that the square root of is rational. If the square root of
is rational then we can write
with
and
not sharing any common factors. We can do some math:
which means
. But this means
is a multiple of
since it’s an integer times
. We just proved that if
is a multiple of
then so is
. This means that
is a multiple of 3. But if
is a multiple of
it can be written as
. Let’s plug this in to get
, simplifying we get that
. Let’s divide through by
to get
. This means that
is a multiple of
since it’s
times an integer. But again, if
is a multiple of
then so is
. We started off by assuming that
and
had no common factors and we just showed that they share a common factor of
. We’ve derived a contradiction to our proposition that
is rational, therefore it must be irrational.